Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
To: cagney@gnu.org, mec.gnu@mindspring.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, tausq@debian.org
Subject: Re: native hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00, 32-bit versus 64-bit
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040627042052.CABC44B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> (raw)

ac> What's the ABI wordsize - the size of a register pushed onto the stack? 
ac> "info registers" should be using that register size and looking at the 
ac> HP/PA code, that appears to be the case.

It's 4 bytes, all right.

ac> It might also pay to check out `file gdb`, `file test-program`, "(gdb) 
ac> show architecture" and "(gdb) maint print registers" to see what's been 
ac> compbined.  At least for other architectures only a 64-bit native 

  /home/mec/bin/gdb-611:  PA-RISC1.1 shared executable dynamically linked -not stripped
  a.out:          PA-RISC2.0 shared executable dynamically linked -not stripped

  (gdb-611) show architecture
  The target architecture is set automatically (currently hppa1.0)

The funny thing is, gdb 6.1.1 "maint print registers" says that
r19 is 4 bytes long, but "info reg r19" has special code to print
all 8 bytes of it.

I'm still kinda dubious, but if it's okay with randolph that the
debugger quietly operates in 32-bit mode, it's okay with me.
I would do something like this:

  gdb_test_multiple "info reg r19" "$name" {
    -re "r19 deadbeefbadcadee ..." {
      pass "$name (64 bit)"
    }
    -re "r19 "badcadee ..." {
      pass "$name (32 bit)"
    }
  }

Michael C


             reply	other threads:[~2004-06-27  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-27  4:20 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
2004-06-27 18:40 ` Randolph Chung
2004-06-27 18:57   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-28 14:51   ` Andrew Cagney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-26 23:28 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-06-27  1:52 ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040627042052.CABC44B104@berman.michael-chastain.com \
    --to=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=tausq@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox