From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31278 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2004 07:41:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31250 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2004 07:41:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Jun 2004 07:41:35 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5N7fYe1004185 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 03:41:35 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5N7fYw20211 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 03:41:34 -0400 Received: from cygbert.vinschen.de (vpn50-23.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.23]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5N7fXP04565 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 00:41:33 -0700 Received: by cygbert.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7C893582E3; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:41:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:41:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Post GDB 6.2, require new frame code Message-ID: <20040623074129.GB15652@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <40D34274.50803@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D34274.50803@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 On Jun 18 15:28, Andrew Cagney wrote: > So as to avoid the problem of this dragging on indefinitely, we need to > establish a clear schedule by which all architectures are expected to > have been updated. To that end: > > - make GDB 6.2 the last release to support the legacy frame code > > - in 6.2 NEWS, list unconverted architectures as about to be obsoleted > > - Post 6.2 release, obsolete any remaining architectures Sounds like a good plan. I just think that there should also be a clear hint how much time is left, something along the lines of "6 months from now" or so. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Co-Project Leader Red Hat, Inc.