From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26048 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2004 15:31:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26032 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2004 15:31:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hall.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.60) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2004 15:31:22 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BacNR-0000MZ-00; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:31:01 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id D08E04B104; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:31:00 -0400 (EDT) To: aoliva@redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, bje+dated+1087798498.8ed310@air.net.au, brobecker@gnat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, Joe.Buck@synopsys.com, zack@codesourcery.com Message-Id: <20040616153100.D08E04B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:31:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 Andrew C writes: > Independent of what happens to this thread, I think GDB (and GCC?) > should clarify their test procedures so that they don't direct the > developer towards src/expect/. I agree. I guess it's my job to write some doco on "how to run the gdb test suite", and I'll include the steps for downloading tcl + expect + dejagnu from their public release locations and then building the things. I've added this to my to-do list. One thing I need is a Cygwin + gdb testsuite volunteer. Anybody out there? Michael C