From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27672 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2004 06:11:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27526 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2004 06:11:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2004 06:11:18 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 3CB7547D70; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:11:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 06:11:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ben Elliston Cc: Alexandre Oliva , Joe Buck , Zack Weinberg , Ben Elliston , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Message-ID: <20040616061117.GA1502@gnat.com> References: <20040615141501.A19302@mailhub.air.net.au> <87zn74zevv.fsf@taltos.codesourcery.com> <20040615154957.A5587@synopsys.com> <20040616133517.A26041@mailhub.air.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040616133517.A26041@mailhub.air.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 > Who is going to do that work? History says "no one". Actually, I did. I'm now in the process of upgrading all our native configurations with released versions of tcl+expect+dejagnu (which have to be fetched from 3 different places, btw). It's no fun, that's for sure. Fortunately, I'm almost done now, but I found that I'm having a blocking problem on Tru64 with expect. Not sure yet if the problem is in expect or tcl, I'm still debugging, but I feel like I'm wasting time that could have been used on GDB rather than expect and tcl. -- Joel