Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: java@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Binary Compatibility: debug info for compiled Java programs
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 13:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040609130859.GA7514@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16582.65277.81118.189889@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:13:49PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> At the gcc summit last week, we were asked about how we're going to do
> debug info for programs compiled with the BC ABI.  This is a problem:
> as we don't know the layout of objects at compile time, we can't
> generate the usual DWARF debugging type info.
> 
> I said that there were two front-running solutions: calling into
> libgcj runtime routines that access the metadata, or generating DWARF
> debugging type info at run time.  Andrew Cagney objects to calling
> libgcj runtime routines, because then we won't be able to debug core
> files.  Also, if the runtime library is hosed for some reason, we
> won't be able to debug any structures.  This is a good point, and I
> suppose it more or less kills the idea.
> 
> Bryce pointed out that there is another solution that he favours,
> which involves gdb reading libgcj's metadata.

I'm not familiar with the BC ABI (and missed the talk); could you give
me an example of what information you have at compile time and what you
generate at runtime?

I suspect that a fourth solution is possible: gcj generating DWARF
which describes how to read the metadata.  It may not be very
efficient, though, and it will still require a certain amount of
playing with GDB.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz


  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-09 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-09 12:15 Andrew Haley
2004-06-09 13:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-06-09 13:19   ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-09 13:29     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-09 13:39       ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-09 22:17         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-09 22:37           ` Tom Tromey
2004-06-10 16:37             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-10 16:42               ` Tom Tromey
2004-06-10 16:47                 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-06-10 16:58                   ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-10 17:12                     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-06-10 17:25                       ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-10 16:44               ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-10 16:54                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-09 14:13 ` Per Bothner
2004-06-09 14:20   ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-09 20:46 ` Anthony Green
2004-06-09 21:26   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-09 22:11     ` Anthony Green
2004-06-11 13:04     ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-11 15:11       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-11 15:17         ` Andrew Haley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040609130859.GA7514@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox