From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1799 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2004 21:58:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1784 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2004 21:58:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mclean.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.57) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Jun 2004 21:58:00 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BXS7y-0008WH-00; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:57:59 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 4F2554B104; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:57:57 -0400 (EDT) To: gdb@sources.redhat.com, jingham@apple.com Subject: Re: [Gdb] removing src/dejagnu, src/expect Message-Id: <20040607215757.4F2554B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 21:58:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 Jim Ingham writes: > I just reran the gdb testsuite - on the Apple gdb but this shouldn't > make much difference - with the Expect 5.38 from the SourceForge > sources, and with Tcl 8.4.4, also from SourceForge, and I didn't see > any new failures compared with the expect & tcl from src/. I've done a similar comparison with the gdb testsuite on native i686-pc-linux-gnu, (red hat 8.0, LANG=en_US.UTF-8), and the results came out the same. I've been using the released versions of tcl+expect+dejagnu for 2.5 years now. That's just gdb experience though. I'm okay with shooting first and fixing problems later. Michael C