From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28034 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2004 16:13:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27923 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2004 16:13:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2004 16:13:49 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BWdno-0007tG-4K; Sat, 05 Jun 2004 12:13:48 -0400 Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 16:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: bje@au.ibm.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Gdb] removing src/dejagnu, src/expect Message-ID: <20040605161347.GA30285@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , bje@au.ibm.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20040605143942.E37E74B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040605143942.E37E74B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 10:39:42AM -0400, Michael Chastain wrote: > > At yesterday's GCC Summit testing BOF, there was a strong concensus > > that these directories should be removed from the src tree and that > > developers should install the latest releases of Expect and Dejagnu > > from their distribution/packaging system or from a source tarball at > > ftp.gnu.org. > > Err, I'm kinda surprised that the "GCC Summit" has enough src/ > people to make decisions about src/. Are Andrew Cagney (gdb) > and Daniel Jacobowitz (binutils) there? Yes (although I skipped the testing BOF out of sleepiness :). I'm redirecting this to the main GDB list. -- Daniel Jacobowitz