From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26979 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2004 23:37:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26954 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2004 23:37:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp10.atl.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.246) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2004 23:37:48 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BWOFX-0003MR-00; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:37:24 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 4FA074B104; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 19:37:26 -0400 (EDT) To: gdb@sources.redhat.com, me@cgf.cx Subject: Re: [maint] [maint] Michael Chastain for testsuite Message-Id: <20040604233726.4FA074B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 23:37:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2 Chris Faylor writes: cgf> If we have someone as a maintainer then it seems like their area of cgf> maintainership should reflect their vision, i.e. you can't just give cgf> carte blanche to a group people to do whatever they want in that arena. I think it might be good for me to state my vision. This is all stuff that y'all know about me already. (1) Copyright -- is the most important thing to me. I want every file in testsuite/ to bear a valid FSF copyright notice. (2) Testing submissions -- I mean to require that every patch says how it was tested (or not tested). I don't think it's useful to formalize or standardize how a patch is tested beyond that. cgf> I know that this goes without saying but I thought I'd say it anyway. cgf> :-) Me too. Michael C