From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14897 invoked by alias); 26 May 2004 00:08:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14875 invoked from network); 26 May 2004 00:08:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mclean.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.57) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 May 2004 00:08:32 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BSly6-0003GI-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 20:08:26 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id E38A04B104; Tue, 25 May 2004 20:08:21 -0400 (EDT) To: brobecker@gnat.com, cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, randolph@tausq.org Subject: Re: GDB 6.1.1 2004-05-21-gmt Message-Id: <20040526000821.E38A04B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 00:08:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 As far as test results go: i686-pc-linux-gnu: gdb_6_1-branch has no improvements or regressions from gdb 6.1 hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11: I haven't run this for a while so I can't say The last time I tried gdb HEAD versus gdb 6.1, though, there were some improvements, but also some regressions I need to sit down with that ol' hp test drive machine for a few hours