From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-18122-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 18183 invoked by alias); 22 May 2004 04:52:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18174 invoked from network); 22 May 2004 04:52:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 May 2004 04:52:37 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4M4qbGI007726
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Sat, 22 May 2004 00:52:37 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4M4qa017721;
	Sat, 22 May 2004 00:52:36 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-15.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.15])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i4M4qaLj017143;
	Sat, 22 May 2004 00:52:36 -0400
Received: from saguaro (saguaro.lan [192.168.64.2])
	by localhost.localdomain (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i4M4qUOR004319;
	Fri, 21 May 2004 21:52:30 -0700
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 04:52:00 -0000
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Manoj Iyer <manjo@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfc] was this patch reversed?
Message-Id: <20040521215230.5f44dd5b@saguaro>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405211217450.14836@lazy>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405211217450.14836@lazy>
Organization: Red Hat
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2

On Fri, 21 May 2004 12:29:58 -0500 (CDT)
Manoj Iyer <manjo@austin.ibm.com> wrote:

> Was this patch reversed from the mainline tree?

I don't think so...

> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-04/msg00189.html
> 
> This patch fixed the build break in PPC64. I recently tired to build the
> mainline tree on PPC64 as a 64bit binary.

The patch in question deleted roughly a dozen lines from ppc-linux-tdep.c
I've just done a "cvs update" on said file and do not see those deleted
lines.  (Which is as it should be.)

I gather your build is broken again.  Would you mind posting the build
error?

Thanks,

Kevin