From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21813 invoked by alias); 8 May 2004 00:57:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21797 invoked from network); 8 May 2004 00:56:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 May 2004 00:56:59 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.32 #1 (Debian)) id 1BMG9B-0000Yk-TF; Fri, 07 May 2004 20:56:57 -0400 Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 00:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: CLI is going to evolve. (was Re: [PATCH] implements MI "-file-list-exec-sections" (updated)) Message-ID: <20040508005657.GA2123@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <16530.51947.983270.138336@nick.uklinux.net> <20040501040929.GB17480@white> <16531.37648.806738.186535@nick.uklinux.net> <20040502132531.GB1487@white> <409A9BD3.6050803@gnu.org> <16540.10964.150176.995095@nick.uklinux.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16540.10964.150176.995095@nick.uklinux.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 01:33:24AM +0100, Nick Roberts wrote: > > The last paragraph you cited was Bob Rossi's, not mine. > > Anyway, what's this about?: > > > - N:M breakpoints "break foo" doesn't have to create exactly one breakpoint; but even if it does, that one breakpoint doesn't have to have a single associated address. There might be multiple, for instance one at each inlined copy. -- Daniel Jacobowitz