From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27014 invoked by alias); 6 May 2004 20:11:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26993 invoked from network); 6 May 2004 20:11:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.77.109) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 May 2004 20:11:45 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i46K8gwc000406; Thu, 6 May 2004 22:08:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i46K8g6R001435; Thu, 6 May 2004 22:08:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id i46K8al6001432; Thu, 6 May 2004 22:08:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 20:11:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200405062008.i46K8al6001432@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com CC: cagney@gnu.org, jkj@sco.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com, mec.dot.gnu.at.mindspring.dot.com@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org In-reply-to: <20040505220132.260584B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> (mec.gnu@mindspring.com) Subject: Re: Phasing out Dwarf 1? References: <20040505220132.260584B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 18:01:32 -0400 (EDT) From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) Solaris X86: Mark, can you say anything about this? What debug format does "cc -g" produce on a solaris x86 machine? Not really. The OS doesn't come with a bundled compiler. So I only use GCC. Sun's unbundled compiler on SPARC uses stabs by default, although there is an option to generate dwarf. I don't know whether that's DWARF 1 or 2. There seems to be some evidence that it's DWARF 2. I think dropping support for DWARF 1 is acceptable for i[3-7]86-*-solaris2*. Mark