From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15989 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2004 01:30:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15807 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 01:30:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao11.cox.net) (68.230.240.28) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 01:30:33 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040421013030.CZYP29407.lakermmtao11.cox.net@white> for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 21:30:30 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BFwGd-0001CO-00 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:30:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 04:58:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: -file-list-exec-source-files Message-ID: <20040420143031.GA4605@white> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 Hi, Will someone please review this patch? Why is no one looking at it? I have not received one reply to my pings in 2 months. Why? What else should I do? Does everyone realize the potential GDB throws away every day by not reviewing patches in a reasonable time. When I wrote that patch, I was interested in making the stack,breakpoint,... output show the fullname. As of right now, I am no longer interested in doing that, or anything else that isn't necessary for me to write CGDB. I had many other ideas that I wanted to implement in GDB. As of know, I am no longer interested. Maybe my mind will change in the future, but I can't stand the thought of this long patch review time. Every time I ping for this patch I laugh. I can't even imagine what is wrong with the GDB team to think that my trivial 500 line patch takes 2 months to begin reviewing. I wrote that patch in about 1 week, with out ever doing a major patch to GDB before. What's going on? Anyways, if this Email feels a little negative, it's coming from the frustration of waiting and waiting to get a patch into GDB. To me, it won't be worth it to go through this process again if I don't need to. Finally, the GDB team actually was very helpful to me when I was coming up with the -file-list-exec-source-files patch. I received answers very quickly, and with more information than I could have hoped for. Everyone seems to want to help out during the development and research phase. It just seems that when it comes to patch time, all bets are off Bob Rossi