From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-17878-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26918 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2004 14:08:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26911 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2004 14:08:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO burundai.radix50.net) (82.83.207.240)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2004 14:08:43 -0000
Received: from burundai.radix50.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by burundai.radix50.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id i3IEAGjF016424
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 16:10:16 +0200
Received: (from ibr@localhost)
	by burundai.radix50.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) id i3IEAFlg016422
	for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 16:10:15 +0200
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 14:16:00 -0000
From: Baurjan Ismagulov <ibr@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: cvs build problem with 2.95
Message-ID: <20040418141015.GB10611@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <20040417135354.GB7050@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> <20040417143552.GA7390@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040417143552.GA7390@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2

Hello, Daniel!

On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:35:53AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Fix your headers.  Your <linux/compiler.h> is bad.  I don't know what
> you're running, but it looks like you grabbed an old version of
> linux-kernel-headers from Debian/sid - get a newer one.

Yes, this fixes it. Thank you!


Now I've got another problem:

g++-2.95 -DPACKAGE=\"sidcomp\" -DVERSION=\"0.1\" -I. -I../../../../../gdb-20040415.orig/sid/component/cgen-cpu/arm7t -I../../../../../gdb-20040415.orig/sid/component/cgen-cpu/arm7t -I../../../../../gdb-20040415.orig/sid/component/cgen-cpu/arm7t/.. -I../../../include -I../../../../../gdb-20040415.orig/sid/component/cgen-cpu/arm7t/../../../include -I../../../../bfd -I../../../../../gdb-20040415.orig/sid/component/cgen-cpu/arm7t/../../../../include -g -O2 -Wp,-MD,.deps/arm-semsw.pp -c  -fPIC -DPIC ../../../../../gdb-20040415.orig/sid/component/cgen-cpu/arm7t/arm-semsw.cxx -o .libs/arm-semsw.lo
g++-2.95: Internal compiler error: program cc1plus got fatal signal 9
make[6]: *** [arm-semsw.lo] Fehler 1
make[6]: Leaving directory `/mnt/hda5/ibr/src/gdb-20040415-295/sid/component/cgen-cpu/arm7t'

gcc 3.3.3 gives the same message at the same file. This was actually why
I wanted to try 2.95. I've updated gcc, cpp and g++ packages, and can
still stably reproduce this. I suspect that I should file a bug against
gcc, but before that I wish to have this working. Any ideas?


With kind regards,
Baurjan.