From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Cc: cagney@redhat.com
Subject: New test failures - observer.exp, sigaltstack.exp, siginfo.exp
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040416151243.GA31255@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
These new tests are all failing on my i686-pc-linux-gnu system.
sigaltstack.exp fails like this:
finish
Run till exit from #0 catcher (signal=26) at /opt/src/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigaltstack.c:71
Warning:
Cannot insert breakpoint 0.
Error accessing memory address 0xffffe420: Input/output error.
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/sigaltstack.exp: finish from catch LEAF
The problem is that the signal trampoline is read-only. We can't set
software breakpoints there. I suspect there is no way to do this portably.
Should we skip it instead, i.e. finish right to the place where the signal
was raised?
siginfo.exp fails like this:
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/siginfo.exp: continue to stepi handler
bt
#0 handler (sig=26, info=0xbfffeda0, context=0xbfffee20) at /opt/src/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/siginfo.c:31
#1 <signal handler called>
#2 main () at /opt/src/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/siginfo.c:66
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/siginfo.exp: backtrace for nexti
step
32 } /* handler */
1: x/i $pc 0x8048411 <handler+13>: pop %ebp
(gdb) step
Program exited normally.
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/siginfo.exp: step out of handler
I don't know if this is currently expected, or what. It seems like a
bug.
observer.exp fails like this:
call observer_notify_normal_stop ()
too few arguments in function call
(gdb) PASS: gdb.gdb/observer.exp: sending notification (one observer)
Then all the counters are wrong, since the function call didn't happen.
That's definitely a problem in the test script, since observer_notify_normal_stop
takes an argument; is this not a fatal condition on some other target?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next reply other threads:[~2004-04-16 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-16 16:18 Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-04-16 17:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-17 13:52 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-04-20 16:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-20 21:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-03 19:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-04 19:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-08 21:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-09 13:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-24 0:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-23 18:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-24 0:03 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040416151243.GA31255@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=cagney@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox