From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20357 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2004 18:48:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20349 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2004 18:48:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2004 18:48:25 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i32ImPjj030801 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:48:25 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i32ImPj28254; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:48:25 -0500 Received: from deneb.localdomain (msalter.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.36]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i32ImOnM027824; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:48:24 -0500 Received: by deneb.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1A2A87907B; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:48:23 -0500 (EST) From: Mark Salter To: andrea@adtecinc.com Cc: drow@false.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: Subject: Re: gdbserver breakpoint problem with PowerPC References: Message-Id: <20040402184823.1A2A87907B@deneb.localdomain> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 18:48:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 >>>>> Andre Ancelin writes: > I'm still not convinced. For one thing, gdb is issuing a single step when I > requested a continue- what gives? That is expected if you stopped at a breakpoint. GDB has to singlestep past the instruction where the breakpoint was placed. After the singlestep, gdb will put the breakpoint back and then continue. --Mark