From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3130 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2004 16:33:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3109 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 16:33:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO granger.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.148) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 16:33:55 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B3HVZ-000295-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:33:37 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 354B74B104; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:33:51 -0500 (EST) To: drow@mvista.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: gcc 3.4 regression in gdb.cp/namespace.exp Cc: carlton@kealia.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040316163351.354B74B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:33:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2 > Have you run it since I committed the process_structure_scope patch on > Saturday? I won't have time to really parse David's explanation for a > couple of days but it sounds like I broke this. No, my last spin was for Monday, 2004-03-08. I have another spin in progress for Sunday, 2004-03-14 15:04:08 UTC, but you committed that patch on 2004-03-14 21:08:24 UTC so it's not in my current spin. Rats. Michael C