From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23077 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2004 02:39:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22928 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 02:39:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO barry.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 02:39:30 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B34U5-0006IC-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:39:13 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 33B114B104; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:39:21 -0500 (EST) To: carlton@kealia.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gcc 3.4 regression in gdb.cp/namespace.exp Cc: drow@mvista.com Message-Id: <20040316023921.33B114B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 02:39:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: ptype CClass::NestedClass There is no field named NestedClass (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/namespace.exp: ptype CClass::NestedClass This has been working fine for me with gdb HEAD, suite HEAD, gcc HEAD, -gdwarf-2 since 2004-01-23. I got some FAILs on 2004-01-18 and 2004-01-19. Do you really need gcc 3.5.0 20040119? Can you try gcc 3.5.0 20040315 for example? > I really hate the way we test our DWARF 2 reader - there's no way to > generate the debug info by hand to give a particular scenario, so > instead we have to hope that we can find the magic version of GCC and > magic way of writing a test case to trigger the bug in question. > Sigh. Can we write a gdb.dwarf-2 that looks like gdb.stabs, with assembly language input in it? Michael C