From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11332 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2004 19:45:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11322 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2004 19:45:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2004 19:45:41 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1B1sbF-000862-B2; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:45:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:45:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [remote protocol] Allow qSymbol response to continue packets Message-ID: <20040312194541.GA31078@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20040306235253.GA10376@nevyn.them.org> <4050C69E.7060906@gnu.org> <20040311201632.GA26795@nevyn.them.org> <4050D9B4.7080102@gnu.org> <20040311214033.GA29430@nevyn.them.org> <4050F435.1040906@gnu.org> <20040311233833.GA32710@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040311233833.GA32710@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:38:33PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:20:21PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Protocol's can't make such assumptions. > > I disagree. Anyway, let me take a stab at implementing it the way you described. I still think it's overkill, but I may be able to work out a way to do it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer