From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-17557-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26750 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2004 18:57:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26739 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 18:57:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) (66.187.237.200)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 18:57:26 -0000
Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29IvNIS027768;
	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:57:23 -0800
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i29IvNiX027766;
	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:57:23 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:57:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: What x86 TLS relocations can be in debug section?
Message-ID: <20040309185723.GA27749@redhat.com>
References: <20040308182906.GA29662@lucon.org> <20040308203211.GA10046@redhat.com> <20040309163947.GA18705@lucon.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040309163947.GA18705@lucon.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2

On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:39:47AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > Only the DTV relocations.
> > 
> 
> Can those relocations use R_386_TLS_IE, R_386_TLS_GOTIE and
> R_386_TLS_LE?

Why don't you read up on TLS and get back to me.


r~