From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2146 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2004 16:39:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2131 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 16:39:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.202.55) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 16:39:50 -0000 Received: from lucon.org ([24.6.43.109]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2004030916394801100rojpke>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:39:49 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 739ED64A88; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:39:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 16:39:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: Richard Henderson Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, GDB Subject: Re: What x86 TLS relocations can be in debug section? Message-ID: <20040309163947.GA18705@lucon.org> References: <20040308182906.GA29662@lucon.org> <20040308203211.GA10046@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040308203211.GA10046@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:32:11PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:29:06AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote: > > 1. Are TLS relocations needed in debug section? > > Only the DTV relocations. > Can those relocations use R_386_TLS_IE, R_386_TLS_GOTIE and R_386_TLS_LE? H.J.