From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5380 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2004 20:16:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5358 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 20:16:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 20:16:07 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1Axtpb-0002xy-WE; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:16:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:16:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: John David Anglin , carlos@baldric.uwo.ca, dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb 6.0 Message-ID: <20040301201603.GA11102@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , John David Anglin , carlos@baldric.uwo.ca, dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200403011842.i21IgqKa021349@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <40439982.8010407@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40439982.8010407@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 03:13:54PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>Yes, and HP/UX support in the current CVS source is pretty good; > > I wouldn't go that far (I can get away with saying that 'cos its been me > hacking on it :-). The 32-bit PA support is, lets say, "functional". > > >> but > >> the PA Linux patches will not apply without some serious work. > > >I have some cleanups for HP/UX which I can now submit as my gdb > >paperwork is now complete. I did a build last night and a few new > >warnings have appeared since early Jan. > > > >Carlos had offered to work on getting the debian PA Linux patches > >integrated. > > Can I suggest worrying about -nat changes? As Daniel hints, anything to > hppa-tdep.c is probably no longer applicable (or needs serious thought). These patches didn't use hppa-tdep.c at all - they created a parallel pa-tdep.c without HP/UX support. Beyond that I have absolutely zero idea what the differences are. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer