From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com>
Cc: David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Huge slowdown since 6.0
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040219033527.GB14471@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040218143915.D18075@demos.bsdclusters.com>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 02:44:56PM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
> About a year ago our tools person added symbol-caching to our in-house
> GDB tree. He happened to use an STL map, although there are certainly
> more C-compliant ways. Prior to this change, developers had to use
> pointer arithmetic in their macros to avoid repeated lookups or their
> macros would run too SLOW. Would symbol-caching be something that would
> make sense for mainline GDB?
Maybe, but a year or two ago symbol lookup was a whole lot slower than
it is now. I suspect it would not make a lot of difference.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-19 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-18 21:09 Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-18 21:31 ` David Carlton
2004-02-18 22:45 ` Kip Macy
2004-02-19 3:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-02-19 5:06 ` Kip Macy
2004-02-19 15:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-20 5:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-20 16:42 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-20 16:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-20 17:33 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-20 17:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-20 17:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-20 17:45 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-20 18:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-20 18:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-20 18:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-20 18:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-21 9:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-21 9:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-21 2:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-20 16:52 ` David Carlton
2004-02-20 16:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-20 17:00 ` David Carlton
2004-02-20 17:35 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-19 1:59 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-19 3:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-19 3:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-20 19:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-02-23 19:22 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040219033527.GB14471@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=carlton@kealia.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kmacy@fsmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox