From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5496 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2004 02:44:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5488 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2004 02:44:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2004 02:44:45 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AsvE2-0002R3-8B; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:44:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 02:44:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: carlton@kealia.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Foo Message-ID: <20040217024441.GA9338@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , carlton@kealia.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20040217022008.24CA64B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040217022008.24CA64B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:20:08PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote: > The second template parameter is a "char *"; a value, not a type. > > gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+ emits this: > > .stabs "Foo:Tt(1,1)=..." > > gcc HEAD -gstabs+ just changed to emit this: > > .stabs "Foo:Tt(0,25)=..." > > Do we care? I think the "(char*)(&string)" looks ugly but is legal. > I want to change templates.exp to accept this as a PASS. I've found > enough serious stabs+ bugs with gcc that I don't want to make a fuss > over this difference. > > What do you think? I don't care. Eventually hopefully we will canonicalize this. Code to do it is on drow-cplus-branch (but not used, even there; it can't be until some other startup performance issues are resolved...). -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer