From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-17223-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14216 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2004 20:40:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14183 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2004 20:40:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao03.cox.net) (68.1.17.242)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2004 20:40:36 -0000
Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakemtao03.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP
          id <20040216204037.MPGE2192.lakemtao03.cox.net@white>
          for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:40:37 -0500
Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AspXf-0001CC-00
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:40:35 -0500
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:40:00 -0000
From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: -symbol-list-lines
Message-ID: <20040216204035.GD3978@white>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2

Hello,

Is the "-symbol-list-lines" command supposed to be fully functional?

I tried this.

cd src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi
gcc -g basics.c -o basics
gdb -i=mi ./basics
...
(gdb)
-symbol-list-lines basics.c
^done,lines=[
{pc="0x080483e0",line="7"},{pc="0x080483e6",line="8"},
{pc="0x080483ed",line="9"},{pc="0x080483f4",line="12"},
{pc="0x08048400",line="13"},{pc="0x08048404",line="14"},
{pc="0x08048404",line="14"},{pc="0x08048406",line="0"},
{pc="0x08048408",line="16"},{pc="0x0804840e",line="17"},
{pc="0x08048413",line="18"},{pc="0x08048415",line="0"},
{pc="0x08048418",line="21"},{pc="0x0804841e",line="22"},
{pc="0x0804842d",line="23"},{pc="0x0804842f",line="0"},
{pc="0x08048430",line="26"},{pc="0x08048436",line="27"},
{pc="0x08048449",line="28"},{pc="0x0804844b",line="0"},
{pc="0x0804844c",line="31"},{pc="0x08048452",line="32"},
{pc="0x0804846d",line="33"},{pc="0x08048488",line="35"},
{pc="0x08048498",line="37"},{pc="0x0804849c",line="38"},
{pc="0x0804849c",line="38"},{pc="0x080484a2",line="0"}]

I am seeing 2 potential problems,

Several lines come back as {pc="0x08048406",line="0"},
should the value "0" be documented? or is it a bug?

Also, for some reason, a value is repeated
{pc="0x0804849c",line="38"}. Is this ok?

Thanks,
Bob Rossi