From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-17206-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8100 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2004 12:50:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8093 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2004 12:49:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO web40912.mail.yahoo.com) (66.218.78.209)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2004 12:49:59 -0000
Message-ID: <20040216124958.13792.qmail@web40912.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [208.232.182.41] by web40912.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 04:49:58 PST
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:50:00 -0000
From: gnanabaskaran m <gnanabaskar@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: not debugging low level sources
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>, "Edward S. Peschko" <esp5@pge.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <20040216032250.GA2685@nevyn.them.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2

In hp gdb 3.3, we added a new command "steplast". This
command directly steps into the function, skipping all
the calls(constructors) that evaluates the arguments 

Thanks
Gnana

--- Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 06:55:07PM -0800, Edward S.
> Peschko wrote:
> > hey all,
> > 
> > I did a google search, and never got a good answer
> to the following question: 
> > 
> > I want to debug C++ code, and don't want to step
> into stl_alloc.h, etc. I'd rather 
> > just step into *user* code - and given the number
> of layers in C++, I'm spending
> > an inordinate amount of time bouncing in and out
> of standard headers.
> > 
> > Is there a way to turn off, or otherwise disable,
> what gdb steps into? Something like:
> > 
> > (gdb) block <dir>
> > 
> > or 
> > 
> > (gdb) block function
> > 
> > or somesuch?
> > 
> > Thanks much for any and all answers..
> 
> No, there isn't - but I think this is a really great
> idea.  Would you
> mind filing it in the GDB bug tracking system (see
> http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/) ?
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software                         Debian
> GNU/Linux Developer


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html