From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7721 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2004 19:42:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7701 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2004 19:42:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2004 19:42:31 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1GJgTb01142 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:42:29 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1GJgSM01353; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:42:28 -0500 Received: from 192.168.1.129 (vpn50-62.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.62]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1GJgLX27318; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:42:21 -0800 From: Fred Fish Reply-To: fnf@ninemoons.com To: Andrew Cagney , fnf@redhat.com Subject: Re: DW_OP_piece coming in gcc 3.4 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:42:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, fnf@redhat.com References: <200402060930.34787.fnf@ninemoons.com> <4031193E.6090001@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <4031193E.6090001@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200402161242.19163.fnf@ninemoons.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 On Monday 16 February 2004 12:25, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > I've been tasked with fixing this problem, or at least deciding if it > > can be fixed in the amount of time I have available to work on it. > > Fred, did you get anywhere with this? Only to the extent of determining that it was going to take more time that I had immediately available to fix it in the general case, but that Keith's patch could be adapted to fix the immediate problem and then I could revisit this issue after some more urgent work was done. I would expect that to be sometime in the next few weeks. -Fred