From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13310 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2004 03:19:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13301 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2004 03:19:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao04.cox.net) (68.1.17.241) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2004 03:19:22 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakemtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040216031923.IBOA19895.lakemtao04.cox.net@white>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:19:23 -0500 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AsZI1-0000su-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:19:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:19:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Kip Macy Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [MI] -file-list-exec-source-files Message-ID: <20040216031921.GA3379@white> Mail-Followup-To: Kip Macy , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20040213012946.GB4476@white> <20040216012652.GA3258@white> <20040215173938.R69105@demos.bsdclusters.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040215173938.R69105@demos.bsdclusters.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 05:42:27PM -0800, Kip Macy wrote: > My limited experience indicates that it can take up to 7 days to get > feedback on an idea on this list. At this point the best thing to do > is sit tight :-). I wonder if there is something that could be done to improve this ... Waiting 7 days for a response is acceptable if need be, but from a "scheduling" point of view, it seems rather lacking. Is there anything I could do to help improve the response time of the GDB developers? In general, I am pretty interested in implementing some of the missing MI commands. However, I don't really have the time to wait 7 days for every stumbling block that I run up against. Should I Email the MI Maintainers directly? Or would this be bad taste? Bob Rossi