From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31654 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2004 22:02:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31641 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2004 22:02:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao01.cox.net) (68.1.17.244) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2004 22:02:42 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakemtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040210220242.UTKR13731.lakemtao01.cox.net@white>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:02:42 -0500 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Aqfxp-0000O1-00; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:02:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:02:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Kip Macy , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: -file-list-exec-source-files implementation Message-ID: <20040210220241.GC1220@white> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Kip Macy , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20031216001040.GA7871@white> <3FF324DC.2090801@gnu.org> <20040207022317.GA7882@white> <20040206182551.R45697@demos.bsdclusters.com> <20040207044112.GA383@white> <20040207110106.S36507@demos.bsdclusters.com> <40295451.1060302@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40295451.1060302@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 04:59:45PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >^done,symfiles={symfile=[{filename="foo.c",fullname="/home/.../foo.c"}],symfile=[{...}]}, > >>psymfiles={psymfile=[{filename="bar.c",fullname="/home/.../bar.c"}]} > > > > > >I can't say if this output would be "appropriate", but it is more in > >line with the documented MI grammar. > > It's certainly closer (yes trying to get it right is important :-). > > I think it should simply be: > > ^done,files=[{filename="bar.c",fullname="/foo/bar.c"},...] > > Since symtab and psymtab are internal implementation details they > shouldn't be revealed by this command. Ok, I like this better also, I was trying to closer mirror the 'info sources' command. > > Andrew > > (don't forget doco and test updates) No problem. Thanks, Bob Rossi