From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19399 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2004 22:27:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19313 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2004 22:27:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maynard.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.243) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Feb 2004 22:27:21 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AqJs3-00069O-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:27:15 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 3E6D34B363; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:27:38 -0500 (EST) To: cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Pending breakpoints and scripts Message-Id: <20040209222738.3E6D34B363@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:27:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 > Thoughts? You might not agree with this thought ... push back the branch cut until there haven't been any new "breakpoint pending" issues surfaced for a week. (Kind of a brutal thought, I know) Michael C