Re: remote protocol support for TARGET_OBJECT_AUXV

Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-26T06:14:23Z

> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:06:15 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> >
> > Er, no. "Enn" as a reply packet is a fundamental part of the protocol
> > and can't be removed. Whats lacking is the formal specification of its
> > contents. For the moment I'd leave that part of roland's doco as is.
>
> Yeah, I agree. Eli, it does have a useful meaning: it means that an
> error occured. It just neglects to tell us _what_ :)

Sorry, I must be misunderstanding the issue. So, once again, could
someone please explain to my confused self what is the meaning of "NN"
in "ENN"?