From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-17027-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28186 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2004 09:27:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28172 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2004 09:27:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sinope.kasserver.com) (62.141.48.112)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 09:27:57 -0000
Received: from kyromaster (pD955D7C7.dip.t-dialin.net [217.85.215.199])
	by sinope.kasserver.com (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.3 (i386)) with ESMTP id EF962693A53
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:27:55 +0100 (CET)
Reply-To: <michaelstather@nuzi.de>
From: "Michael Stather" <michaelstather@nuzi.de>
To: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Does current GDB work correctly woth gcc 3.3 (3.4)?
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:27:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <20040128092756.EF962693A53@sinope.kasserver.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2

I already asked this several times before, but I got no answer:
Does the upcoming gcc work correctly with gcc 3.x gereated executables
or does the "ignore breakpoints in constructor" bug still exist.

If yes, when it=B4s estimated to be fixed?

I think all linux developers need this to work with gdb reliabely!

regards

Michael