From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18872 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2004 16:47:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18865 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2004 16:47:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2004 16:47:10 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AhAeE-0000wv-Fz for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:47:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:47:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: c++/1512: no canonical way to output names of C++ types] Message-ID: <20040115164710.GA3374@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <4006BD4E.4050007@gnu.org> <20040115162531.GA2815@nevyn.them.org> <4006C0DF.10409@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4006C0DF.10409@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:33:35AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > >Possibly. We search for the canonical form in the symbol table, which > >means we need to canonicalize before adding them to the (partial, full, > >maybe minimal also) symbol table. The trick will be delaying the > >add-to-symbol-table until the symbol is needed, using a clever trick > >suggested by Ian - keeping a list of pending symbols by basename, > >basically. > > Is there a pointer to this thread? Yes, it was on gcc-patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg02174.html and followups. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer