From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27751 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2004 15:35:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27743 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 15:35:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO prometheus.ds9.ch) (212.101.16.178) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 15:35:52 -0000 Received: by prometheus.ds9.ch (Postfix, from userid 502) id 115AAFAE1; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:35:51 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:35:00 -0000 From: Marcel Lanz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb, c++ & namespaces Message-ID: <20040114153550.GA31820@ds9.ch> References: <20040114120213.684F44B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <20040114134920.GA29776@ds9.ch> <40056066.8090807@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40056066.8090807@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:29:42AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >I've read about two debug formats: stabs and dwarf. In the manual of Mr. > >Stallman, stabs is recommended "for best results" with c++. > > Hmm, bug. Which manual? section 10.4.1 in "Debugging with GDB: The GNU Source-Level Debuger" for GDB Version 5.1.1. I have the book here.