From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29231 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2004 13:53:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29219 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 13:53:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 13:53:59 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AglT4-0000dJ-KQ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:53:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:53:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Klaus Zeitler Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb 6.0 backtrace on Solaris 5.8 Message-ID: <20040114135358.GA2400@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Klaus Zeitler , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:25:43PM +0100, Klaus Zeitler wrote: > > I'm using gdb 6.0 on solaris 5.8 and I'm having problems with the backtrace > that gdb 6.0 shows. 'bt' sometimes doesn't show all the calls. I've tried > a few small example programs, but couldn't reproduce it there :-(. > Today I tried to look at an emacs (CVS version) crash and here gdb 6.0 refused > to show any backtrace at all: You'll want to try a CVS snapshot. Mark has rewritten the SPARC port, and also fixed a bug that caused backtraces to stop when PC == 0. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer