From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30014 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2004 12:43:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29986 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 12:42:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO prometheus.ds9.ch) (212.101.16.178) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 12:42:57 -0000 Received: by prometheus.ds9.ch (Postfix, from userid 502) id 709FBFAE1; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:42:56 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:43:00 -0000 From: Marcel Lanz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb, c++ & namespaces Message-ID: <20040114124256.GA27489@ds9.ch> References: <20040114120213.684F44B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040114120213.684F44B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2 Thank you. It seems the worth to rebuild my debugger. On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 07:02:13AM -0500, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > But It would be interesting to me to know why it fails ? just a line. > > Honestly, we have so much work to do for gdb 6.0 and gdb 6.1, > it's unlikely that anyone will want to diagnose a problem with > gdb 5.2.1. So you might get a response to this, but don't be > surprised if you don't. > > Michael C > GDB QA Guy