From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16325 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2004 12:02:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16318 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 12:02:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO granger.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.148) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 12:02:14 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Agjio-0004Vu-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:02:06 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 684F44B104; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:02:13 -0500 (EST) To: marcel.lanz@ds9.ch, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: gdb, c++ & namespaces Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040114120213.684F44B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:02:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00176.txt.bz2 > But It would be interesting to me to know why it fails ? just a line. Honestly, we have so much work to do for gdb 6.0 and gdb 6.1, it's unlikely that anyone will want to diagnose a problem with gdb 5.2.1. So you might get a response to this, but don't be surprised if you don't. Michael C GDB QA Guy