From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24648 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2004 14:36:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24637 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 14:36:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2004 14:36:21 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AexkI-0008W8-PF; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:36:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 14:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1 Message-ID: <20040109143618.GA32690@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3FFDBE02.2030609@gnu.org> <6654-Fri09Jan2004105457+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6654-Fri09Jan2004105457+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:54:57AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:30:58 -0500 > > From: Andrew Cagney > > > > (kind of a bit late but ...) > > Are there any "bugs" GDB would like to see fixed in GCC 3.4? > > How about this thingy: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-12/msg00271.html > > Does it sound like a GCC bug? No idea without more information. Did you ever get dwarfdump to work on COFF? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer