From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8917 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2004 00:15:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8834 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 00:15:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2004 00:15:22 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AekJ7-0005Kc-Ry; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 19:15:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:15:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function Message-ID: <20040109001521.GA20426@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20040106144950.GA18492@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040106150203.GA21353@nevyn.them.org> <20040106152719.GA21416@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040106162324.GB28039@nevyn.them.org> <20040106163333.GE19687@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040106163621.GA20501@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:06:58PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > I like the patch. > > Will the 'breako2' tests in gdb.base/break.exp exercise this? No, I don't think so. I've been sitting on it until I have time to exercise it on both a compiler which produces inadequate debug info (all current GCCs) and one which doesn't (like the hammer or rtlopt branches, I think). -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer