From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13149 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2004 21:24:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13137 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 21:24:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp10.atl.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.246) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 21:24:02 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AehdH-00038D-00; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 16:23:59 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 4BE1A4B35A; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:24:04 -0500 (EST) To: cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1 Message-Id: <20040108212404.4BE1A4B35A@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:24:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 > (kind of a bit late but ...) > Are there any "bugs" GDB would like to see fixed in GCC 3.4? http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12267 [3.4 regression] function-at-a-time generates stabs in bad order This imparirs stabs+ support significantly. Anonymous unions are another regression area. I have "compare by gcc" tables but I haven't analyzed them yet. This one bug causes so many problems that it's hard to look at other stabs+ problems. Grossly, there are about 27 new FAILS with gcc HEAD -gdwarf-2 versus gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2, and about 28 new FAILS with gcc HEAD -gstabs+ versus gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+. Michael C