From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24643 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2004 20:33:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24636 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 20:33:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 20:33:52 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1Aegql-0003eM-Ty; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:33:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1 Message-ID: <20040108203351.GA13956@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3FFDBE02.2030609@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFDBE02.2030609@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 03:30:58PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > (kind of a bit late but ...) > Are there any "bugs" GDB would like to see fixed in GCC 3.4? > > I ask this 'cos GDB starting to really use GCC's DWARF 2 info means (per > PPC 64) GDB is also identifying occasional problems in GCC's DWARF 2 code. > > I'm wondering if there are problems that people know about. For the biggest one I know of, see the thread I started on gcc@ on ... Monday? or last week? ... about when to emit debug info for C++ classes. The discussion trailed off without agreement. After that the only huge one I knew about was DW_TAG_namespace, and we've got that covered now. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer