From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21825 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2004 20:30:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21816 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 20:30:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 20:30:13 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AegnA-0003b7-2N; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:30:08 -0500 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Stephane Carrez Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GNUtify TUI code, enable TUI Message-ID: <20040108203008.GA13800@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Stephane Carrez , Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3FF9C6C3.1000704@gnu.org> <3FFDBCF9.5070904@nerim.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFDBCF9.5070904@nerim.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:26:33PM +0100, Stephane Carrez wrote: > Hi! > > Andrew Cagney wrote: > >Hello, > > > >I think its time to GNUtify the TUI code. Actually, the code should > >have been GNUtifyed before that faitful first commit, however now is > >better late than never :-) (Stephane's been careful to ensure that any > >new code is GNUtiful, this will fix the old code). As for building > >theTUI by default, its been on the things-to-do-today list for too long > >:-( So the plan is: > > > >~2004-01-10: Rename the files/functions. Mindless, tedious, but > >relatively "obvious". > > > >~2004-01-17: Enable the TUI by default. > > > >comments, > >Andrew > > > > Great! So you plan to have this for 6.1? > > This reminds me some work I did last summer on TUI register window to > cleanup the code and use the gdb new register API (and fix some bunch > of problems...). Not committed because... lack of time? Valentin's birth? > > There is also this TUI testsuite I wrote. It works but for some > reasons sometimes expect fails to recognize the output (:- > > I'll try to resurect my TUI reg fixes... That'd be great. Let me know if you want me to take a shot at the expect problems, I've had some practice with that. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer