From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Cc: brobecker@act-europe.fr, dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca
Subject: Proposal: obsolete target hppa*-hp-hpux10.*
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 02:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040108025031.4FA984B35A@berman.michael-chastain.com> (raw)
I propose to obsolete this target in gdb 6.1 and remove it in gdb 6.2:
hppa*-hp-hpux10.*
This does not include hppa*-hp-hpux11.*, which has active development.
Reasons for removing this configuration:
. gdb 6.0 does not build on this configuration.
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1411
Build of gdb-6.0 on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 fails
This is a different build failure than the build failures
with hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
. there is no development activity for this target
. there is no QA activity for this target
. HP's test drive cluster does not include an hp-ux 10.* machine
. HP has discontinued and obsoleted hp-ux 10.*
http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/tech/tech_TechDocumentDetailPage_IDX/1,1701,5143,00.html
frequently asked questions -- hp-ux
2002-06-30 hp-ux 10.20 removed from corporate price list
2003-06-30 hp-ux 10.20 product support no longer available from HP
Reasons for keeping this configuration:
. Someone (me) is actively working on native hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
If gdb works on hpux 11.11, the incremental effort for development
and QA of hpux 10.20 is not as big.
. There is at least one user (Dave A), which means that there are
probably more users.
Philosophically, I see the issue as priorities. It takes work to
maintain and QA gdb on hpux 10.20. It takes work even if gdb on hpux
11.11 is already working. I would rather spend my attention somewhere
else, and so would everybody else in the world, judging by the level of
activity.
Comments?
Michael C
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-08 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-08 2:50 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
2004-01-08 4:12 ` John David Anglin
2004-01-08 17:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-08 18:04 ` John David Anglin
2004-01-08 18:42 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-01-08 18:53 ` John David Anglin
2004-01-08 19:42 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-01-08 20:30 ` John David Anglin
2004-01-11 15:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-11 22:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040108025031.4FA984B35A@berman.michael-chastain.com \
--to=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
--cc=brobecker@act-europe.fr \
--cc=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox