Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Josef Zlomek <zlomj9am@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 15:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040106150203.GA21353@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040106144950.GA18492@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:49:50PM +0100, Josef Zlomek wrote:
> with inlining:
> 
>         .uleb128 0x2c   # (DIE (0x2a5a) DW_TAG_variable)
>         .long   0x2af2  # DW_AT_abstract_origin
>                 ^^^^^^
>         .byte   0x1     # DW_AT_location
>         .byte   0x56    # DW_OP_reg6
> ...
>         .long   0x2d    # DW_AT_type
>         .uleb128 0x24   # (DIE (0x2af2) DW_TAG_variable)
>                                 ^^^^^^
>         .long   .LASF850        # DW_AT_name: "incoming"
>         .byte   0x1     # DW_AT_decl_file
>         .value  0x3f32  # DW_AT_decl_line
>         .long   0x2d    # DW_AT_type
> 
> The location seems not to be generated for the real variable record
> (2nd part after ...) with inlining.
> 
> Should GCC generate the location for the second part (after ...) too,
> should GDB be able to link the descriptions through the marked number
> or something else?

It's the former DIE (0x2a5a) which is in scope.  It has the name
"incoming" through the abstract origin chain.  So this is probably a
GDB issue.

Up until recently that DW_AT_location in the concrete DIE was missing,
I believe.  You might want to try this (incredibly lame, untested) GDB
patch.  Let me know if it does something useful.

Index: dwarf2read.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c,v
retrieving revision 1.117
diff -u -p -r1.117 dwarf2read.c
--- dwarf2read.c	13 Dec 2003 22:29:06 -0000	1.117
+++ dwarf2read.c	6 Jan 2004 15:01:13 -0000
@@ -1813,7 +1813,6 @@ process_die (struct die_info *die, struc
       /* FIXME:  These are ignored for now.
          They could be used to set breakpoints on all inlined instances
          of a function and make GDB `next' properly over inlined functions.  */
-      break;
     case DW_TAG_lexical_block:
     case DW_TAG_try_block:
     case DW_TAG_catch_block:


-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-06 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-06 14:49 Josef Zlomek
2004-01-06 15:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-01-06 15:27   ` Josef Zlomek
2004-01-06 16:23     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-06 16:33       ` Josef Zlomek
2004-01-06 16:36         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-09  0:13           ` Jim Blandy
2004-01-09  0:15             ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040106150203.GA21353@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=zlomj9am@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox