From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6360 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2004 14:49:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6345 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2004 14:49:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.31.137) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2004 14:49:51 -0000 Received: by artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 29129) id 4B7DB3F9E; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:49:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 14:49:00 -0000 From: Josef Zlomek To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: GDB does not show variables in inlined function Message-ID: <20040106144950.GA18492@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 Hello, when using current GCC mainline and a function gets inlined (by -funit-at-a-time) GDB can't show variables of inlined function (No symbol "incoming" in current context.) The relevant part of debug info: without inlining: .uleb128 0x25 # (DIE (0x458a) DW_TAG_variable) .long .LASF986 # DW_AT_name: "incoming" .byte 0x1 # DW_AT_decl_file .value 0x3f32 # DW_AT_decl_line .long 0x2d # DW_AT_type .byte 0x1 # DW_AT_location .byte 0x55 # DW_OP_reg5 with inlining: .uleb128 0x2c # (DIE (0x2a5a) DW_TAG_variable) .long 0x2af2 # DW_AT_abstract_origin ^^^^^^ .byte 0x1 # DW_AT_location .byte 0x56 # DW_OP_reg6 ... .long 0x2d # DW_AT_type .uleb128 0x24 # (DIE (0x2af2) DW_TAG_variable) ^^^^^^ .long .LASF850 # DW_AT_name: "incoming" .byte 0x1 # DW_AT_decl_file .value 0x3f32 # DW_AT_decl_line .long 0x2d # DW_AT_type The location seems not to be generated for the real variable record (2nd part after ...) with inlining. Should GCC generate the location for the second part (after ...) too, should GDB be able to link the descriptions through the marked number or something else? Thanks. Josef