From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-16624-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21565 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2003 05:30:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21556 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2003 05:30:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2003 05:30:23 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AW7mo-0007Mk-37; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:30:22 -0500
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 05:30:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>
Cc: gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: new demangler
Message-ID: <20031216053022.GA28127@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>,
	gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
References: <yf2llpdvgko.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> <20031215225452.GA23169@nevyn.them.org> <yf2he01vg6z.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> <m3y8tdfzir.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <yf2d6apvfg2.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> <m3u141fz28.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <m3ptepfyxh.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <yf28yldvevq.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> <m3he01fygc.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <yf23cblveh7.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <yf23cblveh7.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00231.txt.bz2

On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:38:28PM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> On 15 Dec 2003 18:33:39 -0500, Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com> said:
> > David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com> writes:
> >> On 15 Dec 2003 18:23:22 -0500, Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com> said:
> 
> >>> Here's the patch.
> 
> >> Thanks!  Now, when I demangle that name with just DMGL_ANSI, I get
> >> "C::CClass::operator=".  Am I going crazy, or was there once '()'
> >> stuck on the end of that?
> 
> > Hmmm, I doubt there was ever '()' at the end.  I would expect to see
> > `(C::CClass const&)' at the end.
> 
> Okay; I'll just stick in the DMGL_PARAMS for now, then - my tests
> start passing again with that change.  (Or I could rewrite the code
> that parses the output to not look for parentheses, I suppose.)

Do the former for now.

When I can figure out a few more points of C++ grammar - it's taken me
a *(!&#@ month so far and it's barely functional... - I'll have an
efficient solution for breaking down names into the demangler's trees. 
This will let us get the information we want much more reliably.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer