From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-16565-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 10040 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2003 15:11:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 10029 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2003 15:11:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr) (193.140.236.6)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2003 15:11:22 -0000
Received: from ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr (ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr [127.0.0.1])
	by ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr (8.12.8/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBBFBJ6P006216
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:11:19 +0200
Received: (from ibr@localhost)
	by ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBBFBITe006215
	for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:11:18 +0200
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:11:00 -0000
From: Baurjan Ismagulov <ibr@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: optind
Message-ID: <20031211151116.GB6113@ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <20031210142045.GL23712@ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr> <20031210144917.GA9115@nevyn.them.org> <20031210160910.GM23712@ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr> <jezne0vegn.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20031210165318.GO23712@ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr> <m37k14wqnd.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20031210171715.GA6721@nevyn.them.org> <20031210173730.GP23712@ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr> <20031211141008.GA26315@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031211141008.GA26315@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2

Hello, Daniel!

On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 09:10:08AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > 1. How can the visibility of a symbol be controlled by the library?
> Look of visibility in the GNU ld manual.

Ok.


> > 2. Why does this get much more fun for function addresses?
> Because the rules on resolving symbols are much more general than the
> case of copy relocations, which is quite simple.

But this is not related to fixing this particular copy relocation
resolution problem in gdb, or do I understand it wrongly?


Going to file the bug and read some sources...


With kind regards,
Baurjan.