From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-16442-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12233 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2003 17:38:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12214 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 17:37:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 17:37:58 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ARawl-0001Er-Hh; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:37:55 -0500
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 17:38:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>
Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>,
	ac131313@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, wcohen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Slow handling of C++ symbol names
Message-ID: <20031203173755.GA4506@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>,
	Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>,
	ac131313@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, wcohen@redhat.com
References: <20031203164734.201124B35B@berman.michael-chastain.com> <m3oeupet4b.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20031203170823.GA9475@nevyn.them.org> <m3fzg1erfc.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3fzg1erfc.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2

On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:34:31PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> 
> > GDB never does set DMGL_VERBOSE.  Are you sure the old demangler
> > wouldn't produce that without DMGL_VERBOSE?
> > 
> > Maybe the old demangler had a test reversed.  ISTR that c++filt passes
> > DMGL_VERBOSE, and that generates std::string rather than
> > std::basic_string for the above.
> 
> Well, hmmm.  The code looks right to me.  When I run my copy of
> c++filt built with the old demangler, I get the long string, as
> expected.
> 
> I note that DMGL_VERBOSE was only added on 2002-02-05, so if you're
> using a c++filt from sources before that you will get the smaller
> demangling.

I'm using one from binutils as of a month or so ago, and I get the
short string.  Hmm.  I don't know quite what's going on.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer