From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26759 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2003 20:27:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26752 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 20:27:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO barry.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 20:27:18 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1ARdaf-0002DU-00; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:27:17 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 7977F4B35B; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:20:09 -0500 (EST) To: ian@wasabisystems.com Subject: Re: Slow handling of C++ symbol names Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, wcohen@redhat.com Message-Id: <20031203172009.7977F4B35B@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 20:27:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 As far as DMGL_VERBOSE and other DMGL_* options go, I am actually just running two versions of c++filt with no special options and then comparing the results. So I am not covering the layer of software where gdb uses different DMGL_* options. A little grep fu says that gdb uses combinations of: DMGL_NO_OPTS DMGL_ANSI DMGL_ARM DMGL_JAVA DMGL_PARAMS Michael C