From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-16426-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15833 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2003 22:29:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15805 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 22:29:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 22:29:51 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ARJ1f-0004PS-VQ; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:29:47 -0500
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:29:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>
Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>,
	ac131313@redhat.com, wcohen@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Slow handling of C++ symbol names
Message-ID: <20031202222947.GA16937@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>,
	Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>,
	ac131313@redhat.com, wcohen@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <20031202220907.683774B362@berman.michael-chastain.com> <m3ptf6j1uz.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3ptf6j1uz.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2

On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:23:16PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) writes:
> 
> > So, the new demangler is printing different, much smaller output.
> 
> That's odd.  I could understand it if gdb were passing DMGL_VERBOSE to
> cplus_demangle().  But as far as I know it is not doing so in any
> version.  Could you extract a few of the larger demangled names from
> each version, and post them?  It might be a good double-check that
> something isn't weirdly broken.  It would be nice to have the mangled
> symbol name too, but not critical.
> 
> Thanks.

My guess is that this has something to do with DMGL_PARAMS.  But again
that's odd since we ought to be passing that when we demangle msyms.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer